In the context of appeals, what does 'appeal of the facts' refer to?

In the context of appeals, the term 'appeal of the facts' primarily relates to the situation where a party contests the outcome of a trial based on the claim that the jury made the wrong decision regarding the facts of the case. When an individual appeals based on the facts, they are essentially arguing that the evidence presented during the trial did not support the jury's conclusions, or that the jury failed to properly interpret or weigh the evidence when reaching their verdict.

It is essential to recognize that appeals are typically focused on legal questions rather than factual disputes. Most appellate courts do not re-evaluate the facts of a case; instead, they review the trial record to determine if there were legal errors that may have affected the outcome. Therefore, the notion of addressing factual disputes at the appellate level is generally limited to the argument that a jury or fact-finder erred in its determinations based on the evidence presented. This makes the identification of an 'appeal of the facts' accurately align with questioning the correctness of the jury's decision in reflecting the facts of the case.